Emotions - health effects

I read the following in a local magazine.

• Brain contracts with increase in age and leads to forgetfulness. However, physical exercise compared to metal exercise and social activities will help to keep the brain active.
• Happiness and heart are linked. More happiness increases heart beats and one will not get sleep. I experience this, when I got good marks (beyond my expectations) in my XII standard, engineering final year, receipt of appointment letter (25 years ago) in the organization of my choice where I am continuing still and my first promotion. Similar is my experience, I was under pressure. 
• Anger affects liver which leads to generation of bile juices and headache. Blood pressure too raises.
• Tension, stress affects lungs and one feels suffocation.
• Depression/sorrow reduces energy levels which affects lungs and leads to associated respiratory problems.
• Fear affects kidneys and one looses control over urination.
• Threat affects heart and at higher levels it can affect kidneys also.

Problems of touch screen operations on desktop/laptop

Touch screen operations on desktop computers/laptop became a reality with Windows 8. Those which can't be imagined earlier, have come into market now. We are not new to touch screens and are using it on mobiles and tablets. Also, we used to limited extent, in the control room monitors of sophisticated industrial facilities.  

I feel computer use by touch screen, particularly desktop and laptop, may lead to aching of shoulders, wrists and forearm after some period of use, when we have to lift our hand every time for touching the icon on the screen. Unless, we rearrange the position of the monitor/laptop to a lower level (needs to be checked and verified before put into use), users may face such problems over a period of time. Operation with mouse/key board and on the screen are thus different and ergonomics experts' advice for suitable placing of monitors is to be obtained.

I had personal experience of such pain in shoulder, wrist and palm when I used my tablet of 7" for about 4 hours continuously once. That pain lasted for more than a day and I learnt my lesson.

Hi-Tec - by how much?

Some product advertisements mention about manufacturing through computer based technology. Some bill boards for spectacle shops mention about computerized checkups and tests.Some new plants are known as hi-tech facilities.
In all these, what we understand is that they use some software or some techniques that run on computers. However, unless rigorous checks are not made to the software before its use, hi-tec can lead to complex problems, which we can't understand. For this, the programmer should understand fully the requirement, which should be specified by the engaging agency in clear terms. If there is no clarity in specifications and the understanding of the same by programmer is not checked, glitches may come later, which may develop in to unimaginable proportions.
What we start with hi-tec, also can become low-tec after sometime, when changes are made but not tested fully.
Management of change, i.e checking the modifications in an existing procedure for achieving the desired output, if not done properly can manage us later.
Some plant facilities started on PLC based operations initially will be suspended and reverted to manual mode because of the glitches. This is because of lack of clarity in what we want, what we conveyed to the developers/suppliers, and what we got. Hardware problems also can lead to similar situation. Sometimes, because of the complex operations involved in operating PLC based plants and poor training, managers revert to manual operations.
If we are overconfident that nothing will happen because a plant is hi-tec and leave the caution to the air, then also we may find surprises.
Hi-tec will be safe only when we address above issues.

Safety officer - not a replacement for plant jobs

Some plant managers are of the opinion that conveying their safety issues to safety officer ends their responsibility. They expect safety officer to attend safety issues and hold him / her responsible for not working on it.

It is like blaming the police for theft in their house, or fire department for fire in their house. Question arises at first place, why the theft/fire occurred. What are the lapses/deviations in the house. Instead of setting own house in order, if other agencies are blamed for their problems, they will remain unsolved.

Conveying safety issues to safety officer is also not a solution. Safety officer can only offer advice, but can not work on behalf of the plant, as he is not the owner of the plant and he does not have the authority or influence. As long as this realization does not dawn upon plant officials, safety issues continue to pileup. 

Responsibility for property damage in a fire

It is common to read in news papers about fire incidents, property damage and accusations of fire services for delay in reaching the incident. But, the main culprit is the owner/tenant of the premises. One should check what measures are taken by the owner/tenant of the premises. There would not have been any fire incident, had all precautions like storing of the materials properly, using proper electrical wiring, avoiding ignition sources, etc are followed and maintained. Similarly, fire detection, warning and protection system should be in place so that even in case of fire, the damage can be minimum. However, hardly any of these measures are taken or followed.
Every building should have sufficient ground storage water and sufficient distance around the building free from obstructions. However, greediness overtakes fire safety measures and all available space is used for creating some more commercial space. Having water for fire safety is not thought at all. All these failures are overlooked and fire department is accused for not reaching the fire incident place quickly.

Who is responsible for safety for works in your plant?

In an operating plant, various works of maintenance, civil, erection/commissioning of new equipment/facilities, house keeping, etc will be in progress under the supervision of in-charges for respective agencies. However, in case of any lapse with regards to safety or any incident/accident, question arises to decide who is responsible for the incident. Though, safety permits may be issued in the name of the executing agency, plant in-charge also should be held equally responsible as it is the work in his plant and is being done by other agencies because of his request. If any incident occurs, brunt is to be borne by plant officials, plant operations may have to be suspended and in worst case plant may be exposed to damage.

Hence, plant officials can't escape from responsibility to ensure safety during works executed by other agencies. 

Booze + smoking = death

It is reported in a local daily news paper that a person was burnt to death while boozing in his room. It is suspected that he did not put off the lighter/match stick/cigarette due to the intake of huge quantity of liquor and this would have caused fire and death.
Lessons:

1. Do not take liquor.
2. If you have to, do it with others
3. Limit your intake to your capacity, in worst case. 
4. Keep the company of a friend/relation who will not consume liquor at all.
5. Do not smoke.
6. If you have to do it in the presence of a person/relation, who will not take liquor.