Which accidents are acceptable?

Now a days, people are opposing setting up of every factory.  The reasons cited are accidents, pollution, etc. Projects are delayed and costs run high. Opposition is expressed going to the extent of damaging public property. At the same time, governments are blamed for unemployment, inability to provided public amenities, and so on. Where from funds will come for governments to spend. Only when overall development happens, taxes are paid honestly and participate in  programmes, governments can do something to its people.

Everybody is concerned about accidents. But, concerns are very high about industrial accidents particularly those related to chemical industry, which are rare. Everyday, many persons die/get injured in road accidents. Many die due to  alcohol/tobacco/drug use, adventure sports, cancer, pollution, different lifestyles, etc. The number of persons affected with these are very high compared to those due to industrial activities.  

This makes us wonder which accidents are acceptable/normal and which are not? Are we accepting regular/routine deaths and illness due to our own making in the course of having our own lifestyle and taking them in our stride as a part of life. And, fear about others.

We enjoy our lifestyle every moment and therefore its ill effects are acceptable? Whereas direct benefits from industries are less visible though indirect benefits are huge and can become apparent only when they are closed.

Every activity will have both positive and negative aspects and we draw a line. But, we magnify the events in industries and ignore those outside. 

We should have realistic approach so that industries can be setup incorporating all measures for safety of people and environment. While issuing clearances, authorities have to ensure that clearances are not issued in violation of rules or by finding loop holes in the law.