A place for my personal thoughts/views on safety, with focus on industrial safety.
We are nothing after our death. Let us donate our body organs for the poor.
Be not afraid of anything. You will do marvelous work The moment you fear, you are nobody - Swamy Vivekananda
If you think safety is expensive, try an accident... - O.P.Kharbanda
Preventable accidents, if they are not prevented due to our negligence, it is nothing short of a murder - Dr. Sarvepalli Radha Krishna, 2nd President of India
Zero accidents through zero unsafe behaviors. Do not be complacent that there are no accidents. There may be near miss accidents (NMAs). With luck/chance, somebody escaped knowingly or unknown to the person. But, we can't be safe, if we depend upon the luck.
Safety culture is how the organization behaves when no one is watching.
We make No compromise with respect to Morality, Ethics, or Safety. If a design or work practice is perceived to be unsafe, we do not proceed until the issue is resolved. - Mission statement by S&B Engineers & Consultants Ltd. http://www.sbec.com/safety/
Human meat gets least priority - A doctor's comment on accidents
CSB video excerpts from Dr.Trevor Kletz, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQn5fL62KL8
Jul 11, 2010
Safety mantra - If you can't do it safely, don't do it
Safety training - for what?
1. Kit
2. Transport
3. Food
The next condition is some sight seeing tour. Even, in seminars we see participants constantly moving in and out with actual serious discussions limited to very few persons. In training programmes conducted within the plant premises also, participants get phone calls to attend some work at shopfloor. Why people will be nominated, if they can't spare the person for the programme. Only for records?
For some, nomination to training programme is like a holiday with pay. They will come at the beginning of the programme and then disappear to do their personal works in the town or see friends.
A training programme will be effective only when participants are subjected to some form of test at the end of the programme and are penalized, if they do not secure atleast minimum marks. Participants should be asked to discuss on a given topic and should be evaluated for their active participation and contribution. If they are involved in any accident or incident after the programme, then he should be asked what is wrong with him or the training he received earlier. May be such evaluation will help the organization to make the training programmes effective and worthy.
Stress on Safety Professionals?
Leaving apart production people, what about the stress in safety man. He finds many hazards, unsafe acts, wrong practices, etc. When he tells plant people, he will get no response or he will be entertained with arguments. Being a safety professional and is responsible, he can't keep quiet. He has to engage plant people in convincing them about elimination of hazards identified. Over a period of time, continuation of such practices by plant people can stress safety person and he may become cynic. It can also affect his health and family life as he carries work place thoughts and tensions to home. Everything at home also appears in disarray and he will enter into discussions first, arguments later and finally he may end up a big loser.
Experts say that safety professionals should not get disheartened for poor response from production people, but I don't think this is possible for ever for any person. Even those preaching professionals would have lost temper at various occasions.
Sometime back when I attended a 3-day training programme, one faculty arranged a discussion (actually a drama / skit) among the partcipants dividing them into production and safety groups. I happened to be in production group and few production people happened to be in safety group. During the skit, When I questioned the group playing as safety department, as they used to question me in my plant visits, they were searching for words as were taken aback by my ferociousness as a production man. I think they understood during the skit what I want to convey to them that they actually make such mindless arguments on the shopfloor with the safety man.
I also enjoyed the skit in repeating the questions whatever they said earlier to me. What I want to convey is that by stepping into others shoes, we can understand the problem and intentions. We can ask production man what he will do if he is in safety department and sees such unsafe condtions. Then, he too may think some alternative. This may ease the stress on both production and safety persons. However, this is possible if there are people who are technically sound and are patient to listen. We can't talk to bullying personalities and is futile in conversing with them. Only written communication with copies to their superiors will have some impact in removing hazards at work place.
Jul 6, 2010
Static charge ?
LINK
Mechanical barrier for avoiding dust explosions
EPA To Seek Employee Participation In Chemical Safety Inspections
EPA To Seek Employee Participation In Chemical Safety Inspections
LINK
Jul 1, 2010
Management of Change (MOC) ?
Further they think that involving safety department is a waste of time or their work will be delayed because of possible discussions. Therefore they carryout changes without following the established safety procedures. Sometimes, there works give the desired results and therefore makes them to think that they are in right direction ALWAYS. This will set in wrong notions, disregard for safety procedures and will set a bad example for the others to follow the same methods.
Ultimately, a day will come when something goes wrong and blame game starts. Safety department says they are not aware of the change and plant executives say that safety department is not doing its job of surveillance and monitoring. If people do unsafe jobs and then wait for others to point out, then nobody can help. Safety departments are for providing advise and also monitor to caution the mangements. However, if people do works by hiding the information, they are doing so at their own peril.
So, change management should first be applied to persons' attitudes and understanding of safety procedures and then established MOC in the system will be followed by these people with complete understanding and regard for system.
Featured Post
Reduced my weight from 96 to 76 kg and tummy from 38-40 to 34-35 inches in about 9 months
I am working in the safety department of a government organization. As a part of the job, I used to go around and interact with person...
-
I was not clear about what is a danger sign, what is a warning sign and what is a caution sign, till I read this article in Safety Daily Ad...
-
A woman consumes cow dung powder and dies on the way to the hospital. She did this as her husband found that she had drawn Rs 50,000/- from ...
-
Bank employee takes a nap on keyboard, transfers millions | The Hindu 293 million US dollars were transferred by a bank employee who was a...